Ryan Zapatka
Yes they will all be full length PNG of just the subject with the feet in it all shot at the same focal length and distance . The background image its being placed on and foreground PNG overlays (that will occur later after the subject is on there) are separate.
And just so I’m understanding correctly — in this case you are saying we should be able to get it to where a preschoolers feet and a high schooler feet would both come in on the same bottom red line and the image of the preschooler will come in at actual size and the head might just be fence level (using this background) and the highschoolers head will appear much higher in the image as it normally would with him looking 6 feet tall as he would. Am I correct? So there would really be no vertical head placement predetermined by the alignment guide–I think that’s where I’m getting confused to as to if it would come in properly since it seems like all the options are based on two predetermined points (vertical head placement location and bottom/foot placement and it scales the person larger or shorter to the bottom determined points which isnt what we are trying to acheive).
Sorry for all the questions—-weve used pixnub a lot but my editor is still unsure if any of the modes can do this. We sort of need it to come in as it would with team builder so each kid is the proper size/height comparison as to how they really are. With templates the proportion doesnt really matter much for indivudals, but since we are using a scenic photo as the template with items in it that have height comparison proportional items like the fence in them we dont want the preschoolers to be 6 feet tall and huge compared to the background image. I guess I should add we want to streamline this so its completely automated and we do NOT have the stop function on each photo to adjust each one.
🙂 Happy New Year!
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 1 day ago by
Ryan Zapatka.